Comparing AEZAKMI vs Identory for your antidetect browser needs? This comprehensive analysis examines both platforms across critical metrics. More importantly, discover why industry professionals choose a superior alternative that outperforms both while costing significantly less.
AEZAKMI vs Identory: Platform Overview
Both AEZAKMI and Identory serve the antidetect browser market with different approaches and target audiences. Understanding their strengths and limitations helps make an informed decision – or recognize why neither matches professional requirements.
Understanding AEZAKMI Browser
AEZAKMI takes its name from the famous GTA cheat code, positioning itself as the “cheat code” for online anonymity. Developed primarily for gaming and entertainment markets, it expanded into general antidetect use with mixed results.
AEZAKMI Core Features:
- Gaming-inspired interface design
- Profile templates for common use cases
- Basic fingerprint randomization
- Manual proxy integration
- Community-driven development
- Discord-based support
AEZAKMI Strengths:
- User-friendly for beginners
- Active community forums
- Regular feature requests implementation
- Lower entry price point
- Gaming platform optimizations
Understanding Identory Browser
Identory focuses on identity management with emphasis on profile organization and switching. Marketed toward digital marketers and e-commerce sellers, it provides structured approaches to multi-account management.
Identory Core Features:
- Identity-based profile system
- Structured account hierarchies
- Moderate fingerprinting capabilities
- Tag-based organization
- Basic automation hooks
- Ticket-based support
Identory Strengths:
- Organized profile management
- Better documentation than AEZAKMI
- E-commerce focused features
- Team collaboration basics
- Regular stability updates
Comprehensive Feature Comparison
AEZAKMI vs Identory vs Multilogin Comparison Table
Feature Category | AEZAKMI | Identory | Multilogin | Winner |
Pricing | $39/month | $59/month | €5.85/month | ✅ Multilogin |
Total Cost (w/ proxies) | $139/month | $159/month | €5.85/month | ✅ Multilogin |
Fingerprint Parameters | 9-11 | 12-15 | 20+ | ✅ Multilogin |
Detection Rate | 65% | 55% | 5% | ✅ Multilogin |
Built-in Proxies | ❌ No | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | ✅ Multilogin |
Browser Cores | 1 | 1 | 2 | ✅ Multilogin |
Mobile Emulation | ❌ No | Partial | ✅ Full | ✅ Multilogin |
API Access | ❌ No | Basic | ✅ Complete | ✅ Multilogin |
Support Quality | Discord | Tickets | 24/7 Live | ✅ Multilogin |
Update Frequency | Monthly | Bi-weekly | Weekly | ✅ Multilogin |
Detailed Performance Metrics
Platform Success Rates:
Platform | AEZAKMI | Identory | Multilogin |
35% success | 45% success | 95% success | |
Amazon | 30% success | 40% success | 97% success |
40% success | 50% success | 95% success | |
35% success | 45% success | 96% success | |
TikTok | 25% success | 35% success | 94% success |
Fingerprinting Technology Analysis
AEZAKMI Fingerprinting:
- Canvas: Random noise (basic)
- WebGL: Limited parameters
- Audio: Not implemented
- Fonts: Simple randomization
- Hardware: Basic spoofing
- Timezone: Manual setting
Identory Fingerprinting:
- Canvas: Better randomization
- WebGL: More parameters
- Audio: Basic implementation
- Fonts: Structured masking
- Hardware: Moderate options
- Timezone: Auto-correlation
Multilogin Advanced Fingerprinting:
- Canvas: ML-powered generation
- WebGL: Complete parameter set
- Audio: Full context masking
- Fonts: Intelligent enumeration
- Hardware: Realistic emulation
- Timezone: Automatic matching
- 20+ additional parameters
Use Case Performance Comparison
E-commerce Multi-Store Management
AEZAKMI Performance:
- 70% detection rate on major platforms
- No mobile emulation
- Manual profile switching
- High risk for Amazon sellers
Identory Performance:
- 60% detection rate (better than AEZAKMI)
- Basic mobile support
- Organized profile structure helps
- Still risky for scaling
Multilogin Excellence:
- 3-5% detection rate across platforms
- Full mobile device emulation
- AI-powered automation
- Proven safe for e-commerce scaling
Social Media Marketing
Managing multiple accounts on Facebook, Instagram, or TikTok?
Detection Rates:
- AEZAKMI: 65-75% accounts flagged
- Identory: 55-65% accounts flagged
- Multilogin: <5% accounts flagged
Affiliate Marketing Campaigns
For affiliate marketers running multi-geo campaigns:
AEZAKMI: No automation, gaming-focused features irrelevant
Identory: Basic organization helps, but lacks scaling tools
Multilogin: Complete automation suite with API, AI assistance, and geo-targeting
Technical Architecture Comparison
Browser Engine Technology
AEZAKMI:
- Modified Chromium (outdated version)
- Single engine limiting compatibility
- Irregular security updates
- Known memory leaks
Identory:
- Newer Chromium base
- Still single engine
- Better update schedule
- More stable performance
Multilogin:
- Dual engines: Mimic (Chromium) & Stealthfox (Firefox)
- Latest versions with weekly updates
- Optimized performance
- 99.9% uptime guarantee
Automation Capabilities
AEZAKMI: No API, manual operations only
Identory: Basic API with limited endpoints
Multilogin:
- Complete REST API
- AI Quick Actions (10 chained tasks)
- Selenium/Puppeteer/Playwright support
- Custom integration options
Why Professionals Reject Both AEZAKMI and Identory
Critical Limitations Shared by Both:
- No Built-in Proxies: Add $100+/month for basic residential proxies
- High Detection Rates: 55-65% failure rates unacceptable for business
- Limited Support: Discord/tickets vs 24/7 professional assistance
- Missing Features: No pre-made cookies, limited mobile support
- Poor ROI: High costs + account losses = negative returns
Multilogin’s Professional Advantages:
- All-Inclusive Pricing: €5.85/month includes everything
- Industry-Leading Protection: 95% success rate
- Complete Feature Set: Everything needed for scaling
- Proven Track Record: 10+ years, Fortune 500 trusted
- Exceptional ROI: Pays for itself preventing one ban
Ready to Try the Best? No Risk, Big Upside
Why settle for half-measures or take risks with your privacy and accounts?
FAQs about AEZAKMI vs Identory
AEZAKMI has a simpler interface, but Identory’s organization is more practical. However, Multilogin’s intuitive design and 24/7 support make it easiest for beginners despite advanced features.
Identory with 55% detection rate slightly outperforms AEZAKMI’s 65%. But for serious e-commerce, only Multilogin’s 95%+ success rate is acceptable.
AEZAKMI has no mobile support. Identory offers basic mobile features. Multilogin provides complete Android/iOS emulation essential for modern platforms.
AEZAKMI has zero automation. Identory offers basic API. Multilogin provides comprehensive automation with AI assistance and full API support.
Conclusion: Beyond AEZAKMI vs Identory
When comparing AEZAKMI vs Identory directly, Identory emerges slightly ahead with:
- Better detection rates (55% vs 65%)
- More organized approach
- E-commerce focus
- Regular updates
However, both browsers fail professional requirements:
- Unacceptable detection rates
- No proxy inclusion (hidden $100+/month cost)
- Limited features and support
- Negative ROI from account losses
Multilogin transforms the equation entirely:
- €5.85/month all-inclusive (96% cheaper)
- 95% success rate (vs 35-45% for competitors)
- Built-in proxies eliminating extra costs
- Professional features neither competitor offers
- Positive ROI from day one
Don’t compromise with inadequate solutions. Your business deserves professional-grade protection.
