If you’ve ever run multiple accounts on platforms like Facebook, TikTok, Amazon, or Twitter, you already know the struggle: bans come fast, and account recovery is a nightmare. According to Meta’s transparency report, over 1.5 billion fake accounts were disabled in 2024.
Add e-commerce platforms tightening their verification, and marketers are fighting an uphill battle.
That’s where antidetect browsers come in. They help mask your digital identity by altering browser fingerprints, separating cookies, and letting you use proxies to appear like different users.
Two names often compared are BitBrowser — a low-cost Chinese antidetect browser — and AdsPower, one of the most well-known global tools in the space. But when it comes to BitBrowser vs AdsPower, which one gives you the best chance to survive in 2025?
Let’s break it down:
- What BitBrowser and AdsPower are.
- Their features, pricing, pros/cons.
- Direct comparison table.
- Where they fall short.
- And why Multilogin remains the superior choice.
What Is BitBrowser?
BitBrowser gained traction mainly among affiliates and airdrop farmers looking for a super-cheap antidetect option. It’s simple, lightweight, and focuses on one core thing: creating multiple browser profiles with unique digital identities.
BitBrowser Features
- Fingerprint masking: Covers basics like canvas, fonts, user-agent, but lacks deeper customization.
- Cloud-only storage: Profiles sync across devices but no local-only option.
- Proxy support: Manual integration with residential proxies and datacenter proxies.
- Basic team sharing: Assign profiles to team members.
- Unlimited profiles on higher tiers: Attractive for beginners farming many accounts.
BitBrowser Pros
- Dirt cheap — one of the lowest-priced antidetects.
- Cloud sync is straightforward.
- Works decently for small-scale social media farming.
BitBrowser Cons
- Outdated interface, clunky user experience.
- Weak anti-fingerprint tech; vulnerable to detection.
- No mobile environment support.
- Limited automation — devs find it restrictive.
What Is AdsPower?
AdsPower is a far more established antidetect browser, often considered a direct competitor to GoLogin and Multilogin. It’s aimed at digital marketers, agencies, and e-commerce sellers needing both multi-account management and strong team collaboration.
AdsPower Features
- Advanced fingerprint control: Spoofs canvas, WebGL, WebRTC, timezone, fonts, and user-agent spoofing.
- Cloud + local storage: Flexibility for teams or solo users.
- Mobile device emulation: Some support for Android/iOS environments.
- Proxy integration: Built-in proxy manager, but still requires third-party providers.
- Automation support: Works with Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright.
- Team management: Role-based permissions, activity logs, collaboration dashboards.
AdsPower Pros
- Strong fingerprinting compared to BitBrowser.
- More automation-friendly.
- Clean interface, easier onboarding.
- Popular among affiliate teams and agencies.
AdsPower Cons
- Pricing can get steep for larger teams.
- Proxy integration still external.
- Mobile support limited (not true native).
- Can feel bloated compared to simpler browsers.
BitBrowser vs AdsPower: Side-by-Side Comparison
Feature | BitBrowser | AdsPower |
Fingerprint masking | Basic | Advanced, customizable |
Mobile support | ❌ None | ⚠️ Partial Android/iOS |
Profile storage | Cloud only | Cloud + local |
Proxy support | External only | Proxy manager (external still needed) |
Team collaboration | Basic | Strong (role-based, logs) |
Automation | Limited | Puppeteer + Selenium + Playwright |
Ease of use | Clunky | Beginner-friendly |
Pricing | Very cheap (~$10) | Mid–high (~$25+) |
Best for | Cost-sensitive users | Teams & agencies |
👉 Verdict: AdsPower beats BitBrowser in almost every category, but BitBrowser’s price point makes it attractive to entry-level farmers.
Where Both Fall Short
Despite their appeal, both tools come with notable downsides:
- Proxy headaches: Both require external proxies. If your proxy settings don’t align with your fingerprints, bans are inevitable.
- Limited mobile capabilities: BitBrowser offers nothing. AdsPower offers partial emulation, but not native Android like Multilogin.
- Detection vulnerabilities: With rising adoption of bot detection software, TLS fingerprinting, and behavioral checks, both fall short against cutting-edge systems.
- Scalability gaps: BitBrowser doesn’t scale well beyond small operations. AdsPower scales better but quickly becomes expensive.
Why Multilogin Outshines Both
When you step beyond hobby-level account farming, you need something more robust than BitBrowser’s cheap model and more advanced than AdsPower’s partial fixes. That’s where Multilogin comes in.
Why Multilogin Wins
- Built-in proxies: Premium residential proxies across 150+ countries.
- Daily-tested antidetect engine: Resistant to canvas fingerprinting, TLS checks, and bot detection tests.
- True native Android + desktop profiles: Perfect for TikTok, Instagram, and mobile-first ecosystems.
- Flexible storage: Cloud + local.
- Enterprise collaboration: Role-based access, advanced logs, unlimited seats.
- 24/7 expert support: In multiple languages.
BitBrowser vs Multilogin
Feature | BitBrowser | Multilogin |
Fingerprinting | Basic | Advanced, enterprise-grade |
Mobile profiles | ❌ None | ✅ Native Android |
Proxies | External only | Built-in residential |
Collaboration | Basic | Enterprise-level |
Automation | Limited | Selenium, Puppeteer, Playwright, API |
AdsPower vs Multilogin
Feature | AdsPower | Multilogin |
Fingerprinting | Strong | Stronger, daily-updated |
Mobile profiles | ⚠️ Partial | ✅ Native Android |
Proxies | External | Built-in |
Collaboration | Strong | Enterprise-ready |
Support | Community + docs | 24/7 expert support |
Ready to experience stealth like never before? Get Control With Multilogin
Frequently Asked Questions About BitBrowser vs Adspower
It’s fine for small projects, but its weak fingerprints make it risky at scale.
Yes, in almost every way — better fingerprints, UI, and team features.
Multilogin — with built-in proxies, true mobile profiles, and enterprise support.
Final Verdict
When comparing BitBrowser vs AdsPower:
- Pick BitBrowser if you’re on a tight budget and just need basic multi-account farming.
- Pick AdsPower if you’re a small team or agency that values usability and automation.
But if your goal is serious scaling — whether that’s running hundreds of ad accounts, managing global e-commerce stores, or farming airdrops — neither BitBrowser nor AdsPower is enough.
👉 That’s where Multilogin shines: enterprise-grade fingerprinting, built-in proxies, true mobile support, and collaboration features designed for growth.