Multilogin vs XLogin: Which Antidetect Browser Wins in 2025? (Honest Review)

Introduction

Operating multiple online accounts has become standard practice in affiliate marketing, e-commerce, SMM, ad verification, and more. However, platforms use advanced tracking methods like browser fingerprinting to link accounts, leading to restrictions, suspensions, or bans that can risk business operations.

Antidetect browsers like Multilogin and Xlogin are essential in overcoming this challenge. They allow users to create multiple virtual profiles with unique fingerprints, ensuring accounts remain unlinked and businesses can scale securely.

Multilogin, a market leader for nearly a decade, is known for its cutting-edge fingerprinting technology, built-in proxies, and robust automation tools. Xlogin, a newer competitor, offers similar features focused on browser fingerprint masking and account isolation.

This page compares Multilogin and Xlogin across key features such as fingerprint reliability, proxy integration, automation, security, team collaboration, and support. We aim to help you choose the best antidetect solution for your needs, with a focus on why Multilogin remains the preferred choice for serious users.

About XLogin

XLogin is a relatively new player in the antidetect browser market, offering solutions for managing multiple browser profiles and protecting against fingerprinting detection. The company is headquartered in China, and while it has gained attention for its browser profile management features, it lacks the extensive track record and transparency that established competitors like Multilogin have.

• Foundation date: XLogin was founded in 2019.

• Country: XLogin is based in China.

• Company Focus: XLogin focuses on providing tools to help users create separate browser environments, mask fingerprints, and manage multiple accounts, but it is still building its reputation compared to longer-standing alternatives.

Feature comparison: Multilogin vs. Xlogin browser

Let’s delve into a detailed comparison of key features between Multilogin and the Xlogin browser.

Comparison chart Multilogin vs Xlogin browser

Browser fingerprinting & antidetect reliability: The core of undetectability

The effectiveness of any antidetect browser hinges on its ability to create unique, consistent, and realistic browser fingerprints that pass scrutiny from sophisticated detection systems. This is where Multilogin significantly outperforms Xlogin.

• Multilogin utilizes two custom-built browser cores: Mimic, based on Chromium, and Stealthfox, based on Firefox. This provides users with flexibility and ensures compatibility across different web technologies. Crucially, Multilogin’s fingerprints are generated based on aggregated data from real-user devices, ensuring maximum authenticity. Users have granular control over more than 20 customizable fingerprint parameters, including WebGL metadata, Canvas, audio context, fonts, screen resolution, and more. Each profile’s fingerprint is automatically matched to the right fingerprint and adjusted to fit the proxy settings, enhancing undetectability. Furthermore, Multilogin guarantees reliability through rigorous daily testing on over 50 major platforms and frequent updates (typically every 2–4 weeks) to both browser cores and fingerprint mechanisms, ensuring users stay ahead of evolving detection techniques. Multilogin profiles consistently pass checks on popular fingerprint testing sites like Pixelscan, BrowserLeaks, and CreepJS.

• Xlogin claims to use an “indigenous” approach, where it replaces the original fingerprint with a different one. However, key details about the source of these replacement fingerprints, the customizability of their parameters, and the frequency of updates are not clearly disclosed. Xlogin’s approach lacks transparency and has not been proven through public testing. This raises concerns about its reliability, especially for high-stakes accounts.

Comparison: Multilogin offers a clear, data-driven approach to browser fingerprinting, with real-user data and continuous updates. Xlogin’s methodology remains less transparent and lacks the detailed track record of Multilogin. For users prioritizing security and undetectability, Multilogin’s fingerprinting technology is the more reliable and proven choice.

Proxy management & integration: seamless vs. manual

Proxies are integral to multi-accounting, providing the necessary IP address diversity. The ease and reliability of proxy integration significantly impact workflow efficiency.

• Multilogin simplifies proxy management significantly by offering built-in premium residential proxies included with every subscription plan (starting from 1GB/month on the Pro 10 plan, up to 10GB/month on Business plans, with more available for purchase). These proxies come from a vast, high-quality pool covering over 150 countries. The platform features an easy-to-use interface for managing these built-in proxies or integrating third-party providers, supporting HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5 protocols. Multilogin includes features like automatic proxy-fingerprint location matching and a built-in proxy tester to verify connections, ensuring a smooth and reliable setup.

• Xlogin does not offer built-in proxies. Users must source, configure, and manage proxies entirely from third-party providers. While Xlogin supports HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5 protocols and includes a proxy tester, the setup process is entirely manual. This adds complexity, potential compatibility issues (as noted by Bright Data regarding residential proxies in certain modes), and hidden costs associated with sourcing reliable external proxies. While Xlogin lists many proxy partners, the integration burden falls entirely on the user.

Comparison: Multilogin’s integrated residential proxy solution offers unparalleled convenience, reliability, and cost predictability compared to Xlogin‘s reliance on external proxies. The seamless integration, automatic configuration options, and included proxy traffic in Multilogin plans streamline workflows and reduce the technical burden on users. Xlogin requires users to manage the complexities and potential pitfalls of third-party proxy sourcing and configuration.

Web automation capabilities: flexibility for scale

Automating repetitive tasks is crucial for scaling multi-accounting operations efficiently. The browser’s compatibility with automation frameworks and its API capabilities are key differentiators.

• Multilogin is built with automation in mind, offering robust support for industry-standard frameworks like Selenium and Playwright (via CDP). It also provides a well-documented Standard OpenAPI, allowing developers to integrate Multilogin seamlessly into custom workflows using languages like Python or C#. This enables programmatic control over profile creation, launching, updating, and management. Additionally, Multilogin features AI Quick Actions, allowing users to automate simple tasks like launching profiles or setting proxies without writing any code.

• Xlogin supports automation via the Selenium WebDriver. Their website also suggests using third-party visual automation tools like Browser Automation Studio. However, information regarding a dedicated API for broader programmatic control or support for other popular frameworks like Playwright or Puppeteer is absent from their main site. This suggests potentially limited flexibility for developers building complex, custom automation solutions compared to Multilogin.

Comparison: Multilogin provides a significantly more flexible and powerful automation ecosystem, supporting multiple standard frameworks (Selenium, Playwright) and offering a comprehensive, documented API (Standard OpenAPI). This caters to both coders and non-coders (with AI Quick Actions). Xlogin’s automation support appears primarily limited to Selenium and potentially less robust visual tools, with unclear API capabilities, making Multilogin the superior choice for users serious about automation and scaling.

Data Privacy & Security: Trust and Compliance

When dealing with multiple accounts, often containing sensitive information, the security and privacy practices of your antidetect browser provider are paramount.

• Multilogin is headquartered in Estonia (European Union) and operates under strict GDPR compliance, taking user data privacy seriously from day one. They have clear policies regarding data handling and deletion; for instance, upon subscription cancellation, all user data, including browser profiles and activity logs, is automatically deleted after three months. Passwords are securely hashed (never stored in plain text), and sensitive information is encrypted and safely stored in the cloud. Multilogin protects user information not just from external threats but also from internal misuse and encourages users to follow local laws. They also offer a recycle bin feature, allowing recovery of accidentally deleted profiles, adding a layer of operational safety.

• While Xlogin claims to create isolated browser environments, crucial details about their data privacy and security practices are missing from their website. Their GDPR compliance status is unstated, and specifics regarding data encryption methods, storage security, data retention/deletion policies, and security audits are not provided. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to assess the trustworthiness of the Xlogin antidetect browser with sensitive account data.

Comparison: Multilogin demonstrates a clear commitment to data privacy and security through its GDPR compliance, transparent policies, and robust security measures like encryption and secure hashing. Xlogin’s lack of verifiable information in this critical area raises significant red flags. For users who prioritize data protection and regulatory compliance, Multilogin offers far greater peace of mind and demonstrable trustworthiness.

Teamwork & collaboration: scaling with your team

For agencies and businesses managing accounts collaboratively, robust team management features are essential.

• Multilogin is designed for teamwork. Starting from the Pro 100 plan, it includes team seats, with Business and Custom plans offering unlimited seats. It provides advanced team management features, allowing administrators to assign user roles, manage permissions granularly, and securely share browser profiles or groups of profiles among team members. This structured approach facilitates efficient and secure collaboration, even for large, distributed teams.

• Xlogin offers basic team collaboration with sub-accounts. For example, the Solo plan supports up to 5 sub-accounts, while the Scale plan allows up to 20 sub-accounts. XLogin’s system is less scalable for larger teams, and concurrent usage of the same profile by multiple users can trigger account security checks. The system is not as advanced as Multilogin’s dedicated team management system.

Comparison: Multilogin offers a comprehensive and scalable solution for team collaboration, with clearly defined plans, roles, permissions, and sharing capabilities suitable for businesses of all sizes. Xlogin’s teamwork features appear less developed and lack the transparency needed for organizations requiring structured collaboration tools. Multilogin is the better choice for teams needing efficient and secure multi-account management workflows.

Customer support & updates: reliability when you need it

Reliable support and consistent software updates are crucial for maintaining smooth operations and ensuring the antidetect browser remains effective against evolving detection methods.

• Multilogin excels in customer support, offering 24/7 assistance via live chat and email in multiple languages (including English, Russian, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Portuguese). They maintain an extensive, searchable help center with detailed documentation and tutorials. Furthermore, Multilogin provides regular, automatic updates to its browser cores (Mimic and Stealthfox) and fingerprinting databases (every 2-4 weeks), ensuring users always have access to the latest technology and security patches.

• Xlogin offers business-hours support (Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM UTC+8). While support is available via Telegram, Skype, and email, users may experience delays if they need help outside of business hours. Additionally, XLogin lacks an integrated live chat option and a rich online help center, so users often rely on community discussions for support.

Comparison: Multilogin offers a demonstrably superior support structure with 24/7 multi-language assistance, comprehensive documentation, and a proven track record of regular, significant updates. Xlogin‘s support system and update frequency are unclear, potentially leaving users without timely help or protection against new detection techniques. For reliable ongoing operation, Multilogin’s commitment to support and updates is a significant advantage.

Pricing & plans

• Multilogin offers flexible pricing, starting at €5,85/month for 10 profiles. There are trial options available, allowing users to test the platform before committing. As your needs grow, you can upgrade to higher tiers, including plans that support hundreds of profiles and unlimited team member seats. Multilogin’s pricing is designed to offer value, with built-in residential proxies, unlimited team accounts, and enterprise security included in the package.

• XLogin starts at $99/month for 200 profiles, which is more expensive than Multilogin’s entry-level plan. While it does offer a free trial, the starting price is higher, and the plans can get quite expensive, especially for businesses needing more than 20 sub-accounts.

Multilogin’s pricing offers more value, especially considering the built-in features such as proxies, automation capabilities, and enterprise-level security.

Why choose Multilogin over Xlogin antidetect browser? The clear advantage

While both Multilogin and Xlogin aim to provide solutions for managing multiple browser profiles, the comparison clearly highlights Multilogin’s significant advantages across crucial areas. If you’re looking for a reliable, secure, and feature-rich xlogin alternative, Multilogin is the undisputed choice.

Here’s why professionals and businesses trust Multilogin:

• Unmatched fingerprint reliability: Multilogin’s commitment to using real user data for fingerprint generation, combined with regular updates and two distinct browser cores (Mimic & Stealthfox), provides superior undetectability compared to Xlogin‘s less transparent methods.
• Integrated proxy solution: Save time and reduce complexity with Multilogin’s built-in premium residential proxies, included directly within your subscription. Avoid the hassle and potential unreliability of sourcing and managing third-party proxies required by Xlogin.
• Powerful and flexible sutomation: Scale your operations effectively with Multilogin’s robust support for Selenium, Playwright, and its well-documented Standard OpenAPI. Xlogin offers more limited automation options.
• Proven security and GDPR compliance: Operate with confidence knowing Multilogin adheres to strict EU data privacy regulations (GDPR) and employs transparent, robust security measures. Xlogin lacks clarity on its security and compliance posture.
• Scalable team features: Efficiently manage your team, regardless of size, with Multilogin’s advanced collaboration tools, roles, and permissions – far exceeding the basic sharing mentioned by Xlogin.
• Reliable support and updates: Benefit from 24/7 multi-language support and consistent, automatic updates that keep your operations secure and effective. Xlogin‘s support structure and update frequency remain unclear.

Choosing an antidetect browser is a critical decision for your business. Don’t compromise on reliability or security.