Multilogin vs. ClonBrowser: Which antidetect browser should you choose in 2025?

If you’re juggling multiple accounts, you already know it takes more than opening a few extra browser windows. You need a setup that keeps you from getting banned, makes proxy management less painful, and actually grows with your needs.

ClonBrowser has gained attention as a budget-friendly option for more technical users. It gives you flexibility with proxy protocols and even has an RPA module for automation. Multilogin, on the other hand, is built to feel effortless — offering enterprise-grade fingerprint protection, built-in proxies, and smooth automation in a package that even beginners can get comfortable with quickly.

Multilogin vs. ClonBrowser: Fingerprinting

ClonBrowser does the basics well — it can mask things like canvas, WebGL, and user-agent details. For light use, that’s fine. But once you’re working with more sensitive platforms, the gaps show: there aren’t many customization options, and it doesn’t have its own stealth browsers.

Multilogin really shines here. With 55+ fingerprinting options and dedicated stealth browsers like Mimic and Stealthfox, every profile looks and behaves like a real, unique user. That’s a huge advantage if you’re running ad accounts, social campaigns, or any workflow where a detection can cost you time and money.

Multilogin vs. ClonBrowser: Proxy Handling

ClonBrowser gives you freedom with proxy types (HTTP, SOCKS, Shadowsocks, Vmess), but there’s a catch — you have to bring your own proxies and set them up manually. It works, but it adds extra steps and leaves more room for mistakes that could expose your real IP.

Multilogin makes proxies a non-issue. Built-in residential proxies are included with every plan, along with 1 GB of free traffic, sticky sessions up to 24 hours, and an IP quality filter that keeps things reliable. Assigning a proxy to a profile is literally one click — no hassle, no guessing, just done.

Multilogin vs. ClonBrowser: Automation

ClonBrowser does have automation tools, including an RPA module and an API — but it’s limited. The API is capped at one request per second, and you don’t get native integrations with frameworks like Puppeteer, Playwright, or Selenium. That means if you want advanced automation, you’ll likely be building your own workarounds.

Multilogin goes much further. It works out of the box with Puppeteer, Playwright, and Selenium, and its powerful API suite supports high-throughput automation. Plus, AI Quick Actions let you chain up to 10 tasks in a single command, so you spend less time on repetitive clicks and more on actually running your projects.

Multilogin vs. ClonBrowser: Pricing

ClonBrowser is cheap to get into — plans start at around $6/month. The problem? Proxy traffic isn’t included. In reality, most users will need 20–30 GB of proxy bandwidth a month, which adds another $20–60 on top of the subscription. Suddenly, that low starting price doesn’t look so low anymore.

Multilogin keeps things straightforward. A 3-day trial costs €1.99, regular plans start at €9/month, and you get 1 GB of premium proxy traffic included. Extra traffic starts at just €3/GB. If you’re a big team, Multilogin can scale up to 10,000+ profiles, with business plans starting at €159/month. The key here is predictability — no hidden costs, no surprises.

Multilogin vs. ClonBrowser: Teamwork

When it comes to collaboration, the two browsers take very different approaches. Multilogin is designed to be accessible for individuals and small teams from day one. Its Pro 10 plan includes full functionality and built-in proxy traffic, making it a cost-effective choice without forcing you to pay for unused profiles. At the same time, it scales seamlessly to enterprise setups with 10,000+ profiles, role-based access, and advanced sharing tools — so whether you’re solo, in a small group, or part of a large company, Multilogin adapts to your needs.

ClonBrowser, by contrast, is geared more toward medium and larger teams with technical expertise. It offers profile sharing and automation through RPA modules, but setup is more complex, and the lack of built-in proxies adds extra overhead. This makes ClonBrowser workable for organizations with dedicated operators, but less practical for beginners or small groups who need a simpler, all-in-one solution.

Multilogin vs. ClonBrowser: Security & Updates

ClonBrowser encrypts traffic and uses SSL/HTTPS, which is good, but it doesn’t clearly spell out GDPR compliance, data deletion policies, or how session storage is protected. Updates come often, but since the platform is still new, many are focused on fixing basics rather than pushing anti-detect technology forward.

Multilogin has a proven track record. As a Europe-based company, it’s fully GDPR compliant, deletes your data three months after your subscription ends, and uses AES encryption for session storage. On top of that, updates roll out every 2–4 weeks, fine-tuning fingerprinting, security, and automation based on real user feedback.

Final Verdict

ClonBrowser is appealing if you’re technical, on a budget, and happy to set up your own proxies. But it’s not a great fit for beginners or teams that need reliability at scale.

Multilogin is the better long-term choice. It’s easy enough for individuals and small teams to start with, yet powerful enough for enterprises running thousands of accounts. With stronger fingerprinting, built-in proxies, and robust automation, it’s the tool that saves you time, lowers your risk, and actually grows with your business.