AQUM browser fingerprinting: customization without advanced masking 

AQUM Browser allows users to tweak fingerprints like Canvas, WebGL, AudioContext, and timezone — enough for basic anti-detection use. 

But it lacks the deeper fingerprint masking found in Multilogin, such as noise injection, font control, and proxy-aligned timezones. For high-stakes, scalable operations, that extra stealth makes a difference. 

AQUM browser proxy setup: Manual configuration and no built-in options 

AQUM Browser supports external proxy integration, but it does not include built-in residential or mobile proxies. Users must source third-party proxies, configure them manually, and handle rotation themselves. While flexible, this adds time, complexity, and cost — especially when managing dozens of accounts. 

Multilogin simplifies everything. It includes built-in residential proxies — over 30 million IPs across 150+ countries — with sticky sessions up to 24 hours. No third-party configuration required. Proxy management is seamless, scalable, and ready to use from day one. 

If you’re looking to avoid proxy headaches and detection issues tied to poor IP hygiene, Multilogin offers a much more efficient and secure alternative. 

Profile isolation in AQUM browser 

AQUM supports multiple profiles but stores them locally without encryption or cloud sync. This increases the risk of session leaks and cross-contamination — especially for multi-account users. 

Multilogin offers full isolation with encrypted storage and cloud sync, keeping each profile separate, secure, and scalable. 

Automation support: AQUM lacks native tools 

AQUM Browser does not provide native support for popular automation frameworks like Selenium, Puppeteer, or Playwright. While users can try to implement scripts manually, there’s no official documentation or API access, making automation complex and error-prone — especially for large-scale or repeatable tasks. 

Multilogin is built with automation in mind. It supports headless and scripted automation via its API and offers native compatibility with major frameworks. Whether you’re scraping data, automating account creation, or running tests, you can script and scale workflows with confidence. 

For users who rely on automation to save time or grow operations, Multilogin is clearly the more capable and future-ready choice. 

AQUM browser collaboration: no built-in team features 

Multilogin is designed to make team workflows simple, secure, and beginner-friendly. Even if it’s your first time using an antidetect browser, you can invite teammates, assign role-based permissions, and share profiles instantly — no manual file transfers or complicated setups required. Cloud sync ensures that every session is up-to-date, while activity logs give full visibility into what each user is doing. Whether you’re managing assistants, remote workers, or a small agency, Multilogin keeps teamwork organized, safe, and easy to scale.

In contrast, AQUM Browser (0detect) lacks built-in collaboration features. Profiles are stored locally, there’s no cloud sync, and permission controls are minimal. To share profiles or manage multiple accounts, teams must rely on manual exports and imports, which is clunky, risky, and inefficient. While this might work for solo users, it quickly becomes a barrier for small teams or new users trying to scale operations without technical headaches.

AQUM browser security: no transparency on data handling 

AQUM Browser does not publicly document its data handling, encryption standards, or compliance policies. There’s no mention of GDPR adherence, profile encryption strength, or data deletion practices after cancellation. For users managing sensitive operations or client accounts, this lack of clarity raises concerns about long-term privacy and legal compliance. 

In contrast, platforms with published security standards and transparent update policies offer users more peace of mind — especially in high-risk industries like finance, e-commerce, or affiliate marketing. 

AQUM browser updates: no transparency or schedule 

AQUM Browser does not publicly share its update cycle, changelogs, or core maintenance details. Users are left guessing when browser versions are refreshed — a major risk as detection systems evolve fast. 

Multilogin, by contrast, updates every 2–4 weeks, keeping pace with platform changes and fingerprinting defenses. Regular updates mean fewer surprises and more reliable account performance. 

AQUM browser pricing: Unclear and hard to compare 

AQUM Browser doesn’t list pricing publicly. Access requires contacting the team directly, and there’s no free trial. This lack of transparency makes it hard to evaluate true cost — especially when you factor in external proxy fees and manual setup time. 

Multilogin offers clear, flexible plans starting at €3.99 for a 3-day trial, with built-in residential proxies included. You know what you’re paying for — and what you’re getting. 

Conclusion

AQUM covers basic anti-detection needs but lacks key features like built-in proxies, automation support, cloud storage, and transparent pricing. It requires more manual setup, offers less security, and isn’t built for scale.

Multilogin delivers deeper fingerprint protection, seamless proxy integration, cloud-based profiles, and full automation support — all with clear pricing and regular updates. For serious users, Multilogin is the smarter, more scalable choice.