Multilogin vs. Ghostbrowser

Multilogin vs. Ghostbrowser: what antidetect browser to choose in 2025?

If you rely on multiple accounts to run ads, sell products, or manage clients, one weak browser session can wreck your entire setup. You already know how strict platforms have become. One mismatch in fingerprints and you get flagged. One burned proxy and you get banned before the page even loads. That’s why tools like Multilogin and Ghostbrowser matter — they decide how long your accounts survive and how far you can scale. Below is a clear comparison, written so you can pick the tool that actually supports your workflow instead of slowing it down.

Ghostbrowser vs Multilogin: User experience (which feels better for daily work)

Ghostbrowser keeps things familiar with a Chrome-like interface, but it leans heavily on manual setup. Beginners often hit friction because many actions require extra steps, and there’s no mobile emulation, which makes managing mobile-first platforms harder. When the account count rises, navigation and profile handling can feel crowded and slow, especially for users who want a simple, guided flow.

Multilogin focuses on keeping things light and easy even if you’re new. The interface is clean, direct, and built around real workflows, not menus. Everything loads fast, and Android mobile emulation lets you handle mobile-first platforms without workarounds. It stays comfortable for beginners while giving power users the structure they need when the setup grows.

Ghostbrowser vs Multilogin: Proxy integration (which saves you more headaches)

Ghostbrowser does not include proxies, so every user must purchase, configure, test, and manage third-party proxies manually. This adds cost and creates more room for mistakes, especially for teams juggling different IPs across identities. Without an internal system to filter weak IPs or handle sticky sessions, the workflow becomes slower and harder to maintain as the number of accounts increases.

Multilogin includes built-in premium residential proxies with 30M+ IPs across 150+ countries. You get 24-hour sticky sessions, bandwidth rollover, and an IP-quality filter that removes weak or flagged IPs before they reach your profiles. You can use your own provider too if needed. The setup is immediate, stable, and designed to stop proxy issues before they become bans.

Ghostbrowser vs Multilogin: Desktop app comparison

Ghostbrowser offers a desktop build, but it still depends on manual configuration, local storage, and more technical setup. There’s no automatic launcher and no system that reconnects on its own, so users often deal with more interruptions. Teams also rely on file transfers because profiles aren’t synced across devices.

Multilogin’s desktop app removes most of the friction. The launcher is built-in, connects automatically, and restarts itself if anything drops. Updates install quietly in the background. Profiles sync instantly across web and desktop, and you can switch devices without breaking sessions. It’s designed to cut steps, not add them.

Ghostbrowser vs Multilogin: Fingerprinting technology (Enterprise security requirements)

Ghostbrowser offers only basic fingerprinting control. It cannot fine-tune canvas, WebGL, geolocation, timezone, or hardware details. It also lacks stealth browsers, so profiles don’t reach the level of isolation needed for difficult platforms. This is enough for simple identity switching, but it won’t protect you when detection systems tighten.

Multilogin delivers 55+ advanced fingerprinting parameters with deep control over every critical signal — canvas, WebGL, timezone, languages, hardware, fonts, and more. Profiles run inside Stealthfox (Firefox-based) and Mimic (Chromium-based), with full extension support. Tools like Active Session Lock, Custom DNS, and Port Scan Protection keep profiles stable across long sessions and sensitive environments.

Ghostbrowser vs Multilogin: Automation (Who makes it easier)

Ghostbrowser supports Selenium only. It does not support Playwright, Puppeteer, Postman, or any CLI automation, which limits how far workflows can scale. It also doesn’t bypass CAPTCHAs, making high-volume tasks slow and manual. For teams running hundreds of accounts or building API-driven flows, these gaps become visible very fast.

Multilogin integrates with Selenium, Playwright, Puppeteer, Postman, and the Multilogin CLI so you can automate full workflows without rewriting scripts. You can run fingerprints, logins, sessions, and proxies with precision. For non-coders, AI Quick Actions automate routine tasks and let you chain up to ten steps into one flow — ideal when you need speed without touching code.

Ghostbrowser vs Multilogin: Security (who keeps your data safer)

Ghostbrowser encrypts profile data and supports 2FA, but it doesn’t follow broader compliance frameworks and offers no clear data-deletion policy. Security works at the basic level, but long-term privacy depends heavily on user-side precautions.

Multilogin follows GDPR standards, deletes user data three months after the subscription ends, and protects account details with AES encryption. Passwords are hashed, sessions are encrypted before cloud storage, and 2FA is required for teams. Daily testing across 50+ platforms helps catch detection issues before they reach your accounts.

Ghostbrowser vs Multilogin: Teamwork and collaboration (which works better for teams)

Ghostbrowser offers team features, but workflows stay manual and limited. Profiles stored locally mean users must transfer files between teammates, which causes version conflicts and slows down operations. Permissions are basic, and there are no real-time activity logs to track changes or keep teams aligned.

Multilogin syncs everything in the cloud with role-based permissions, instant workspace sharing, and activity logs that track teammate actions. Profiles stay updated across all devices. Teams can run bulk actions, pause or resume sessions, and coordinate without passing files around. It works for a solo user, and it scales cleanly to large teams.

Ghostbrowser vs Multilogin: Pricing & long-term value

Ghostbrowser has a Free, Basic (€19/month), and Pro (€41/month) plan. But because it offers no built-in proxies, users must purchase and configure external proxies separately. This increases the total cost and demands more setup time. The free plan limits IP control, which makes scaling difficult.

Multilogin starts with a 3-day trial for €1.99. The Pro 10 plan costs €9/month and includes cloud + local profiles, advanced fingerprinting, AI automation, and built-in premium residential proxy traffic. Annual billing brings it down to €5.85/month, making it one of the most cost-efficient multi-account setups available for individuals and small teams.

Final Verdict

Ghostbrowser can work for simple, low-risk tasks, but its limits show fast when you start scaling: no built-in proxies, limited fingerprinting, basic automation, no mobile emulation, and manual workflows.

Multilogin covers the entire workflow — proxies, fingerprints, automation, security, team collaboration, and long-term stability — in one platform. If you manage multiple accounts and want predictable results without constant fixes, Multilogin is the safer, more scalable choice for 2025.